| Still kicking |
[Sep. 14th, 2008|04:45 pm] |
My primary journal at www.cornswalled.com has been hijacked by a gay rights activist upset at my belief that God's law overrides human desires for sin and fornication.
I'm working on legal options and pursing this through law enforcement. I can't say much more now, but I expect the little pervert will find himself in prison soon. |
|
|
| Update on a_cornswalled |
[Aug. 29th, 2007|10:42 am] |
Good News! Livejournal has suspended the account of a_cornswalled, the user created for the exclusive purpose of impersonating me.
The account had contained a mock interview, which depicted me of being a defeatist Liberal who wanted to abandon Israel to be ravaged by Islamic Militants, so it not only impersonated me, but tried to slander me by claiming I had views which I do not have.
The account has been suspended, and I applaud LiveJournal for taking the appropriate action.
Some people will think I'm being a "Poor sport" or can't see the "Humor" in the suspended journal. I recommend those critics search online for the parody sites that have been set up to mock me. They exist, and far from trying to get them shut down, I even post to them.
Why am I OK with those sites mocking me but not with a_cornswalled?
Those other sites identify themselves as being parodies. A sensible person would not read those journals and think I was the one writing the content. If a_cornswalled had contained appropriate disclaimers instead of trying it's best to actually pretend to be me, I would have had no problems with it.
It also helps that most the "parody" sites about me are actually well written and clever. a_cornswalled appeared to have done little more than take a vile interview and replace some defeatist liberal's name with my own. |
|
|
| Should New York REALLY rename the George Washington Bridge? |
[Aug. 29th, 2007|10:39 am] |
The George Washington Bridge, usually referred to as the GWB, connects New York City, located on Manhattan Island, to the rest of the continental United States. Despite the "B" in GWB referring to the word "Bridge" a large percentage of New Yorkers call it the GWB Bridge.
The letters "GWB" also refer to the current president George W. Bush.
These two facts have collided and caused many people to think that the "GWB" acronym refers to the current president. At first, it was mostly out of town visitors who made the mistake, but now that "W" is in his second term, many New Yorkers have grown up thinking the GWB Bridge is actually the George W Bush Bridge.
Tourist guides have been printed using the "New" name. None of these have, to date, been produced by the state or city of New York, but many four and five star Hotels are using this "New" name. Most signs referring to the bridge use the letters GWB as opposed to the full name, so maps and guides calling it the George W Bush Bridge rarely, if ever cause confusion.
There's even a grassroots movement in New York City and State to officially rename the bridge, or at the very least replace all signs that contains the name "George Washington Bridge" with ones saying "GWB."
Why rename the bridge? Why even make the "Official" name ambiguous enough to let people use wither name? Isn't that disrespectful to George Washington?
The argument has been made that because common usage is already changing the name, making it official would clarify things, simplify and streamline a process that is already taking place.
Removing Washington's name from the bridge would mean there was one less monument to his legacy, but with a state, numerous monuments and even the nation's capital named after him, one solitary bridge would hardly impact his legacy. Besides, isn't the nation itself a testament and monument to George Washington?
George W Bush was president duing the single worst day in New York' City's history, and has been the wartime President dedicated to avenging New York, and ensuring such an attack never again happens on US Soil. Doesn't his contribution to New York merit some recognition?
On the topic of what recognition Gorge W Bush deserves, it's clear that many New Yorkers, particularly the younger generation, are ALREADY giving him that recognition by referring to the bridge with his name.
People prefer a living legend to a dead one, and naming the Bridge after a vibrant, living leader, one whom today's youth remember, will encourage more patriotism and national pride than leaving it named after a man long dead.
Finally, there's the fact that the New York City Roads department seems to tacitly agree. Road signs are being replaced all the time, and New Yorkers have noticed that a LOT of sings that once read "George Washington Bridge" are being replaced with "GWB." Is this practice no more than the cost saving measure that the Road department claims, or is it a subtle not to the desire of many New Yorkers to rename the bridge after George W Bush?
I encourage all New Yorkers to write their city and state government about this matter, and voice support for the renaming of the GWB.
George W Bush has been the defender of New York, and has been the first President since his father to take action against Terrorism. All Presidents get a library, but George W Bush deserves to be recognized by the city and state of New York. |
|
|
| I'm being impersonated |
[Aug. 14th, 2007|04:24 pm] |
| [ | Current Mood |
| |  annoyed | ] |
The journal a_cornswalled is pretending to be my journal.
If the journal a_cornswalled identified itself as parody or satire I'd be fine with it, but a_cornswalled is impersonating me, and I find that unacceptable.
He's even gone so far as to use one of my user icons to complete the facade. |
|
|
| More about Homosexuals |
[Apr. 5th, 2007|10:02 am] |
A lot of people have been posting to my Blog about my stance on Homosexuality. They parrot the MSM line that it's "Not a choice" while trying to claim that the existence of Identical Twins where one twin is gay and the other straight somehow proves that Homosexuality isn't a choice.
Allow me to present a research paper that gives some actual figures, actual numbers and research into the sources of Homosexuality.
What Causes Homosexual Desire and Can It Be Changed?
There exist several Christian, Jewish and Muslim programs to help Homosexuals recover. Such programs would not exist and would have no attendees if there were no people who wanted to reclaim a normal sexuality. Setting that aside:
85% of these "lesbians" and 54% of these "homosexuals" reported sexual relations with someone of the opposite sex in adulthood,
67% of lesbians and 54% of homosexuals reported current sexual attraction to the opposite sex, and
82% of lesbians and 66% of homosexuals reported having been in love with a member of the opposite sex. (Source)
The vast majority of "Homosexuals" are only gay for a period of time. Take a good look at the next gay right rally. You'll notice that most of the people there are under 35. Despite the propaganda spewed by the Mainstream Media, this is not because they're all dying of AIDS. Research shows that most of them revert to a Heterosexual lifestyle later in life.
Homosexuality is largely a deviant behavior engaged in by young, rebellious youth, many of whom had absent or abusive parents. Despite the views of the few, yet highly vocal, Liberal Christians, Homosexuality thankfully remains a marginalized behavior. |
|
|
| Distorted View and Pedophilia |
[Apr. 4th, 2007|08:36 am] |
It has been brought to my attention that a written text describing sexual acts between children does not, shockingly enough, meet the legal definition of Child Pornography.
Despite the fact that Computer Generated Imagery DOES meet the legal definition of Child Pornography, a written text, or a recording of a voice reading that text, does not.
It would be an understatement to say that I'm shocked by this legal loophole, and I plan to write my congressman on this matter.
As a result of this legal loophole, I will be cease referring to "Tim Henson" as a Pedophile and cease using the term in reference to his Podcast, "Distorted View."
I have not removed or edited the old entries where I used the term, because doing so would be construed by many as an attempt to "Whitewash" the past.
I did not use the term hostilely, or with any attempt to defame "Tim Henson" but did so in what I believed at the time to be an accurate manner.
I would like to reiterate that I believe that Tim Henson's program meets a MORAL definition of Pedophilia and that it SHOULD be illegal to read such stories, but that is a fight I will not pursue at this time.
This does NOT however mean I will back down from efforts to get "Distorted View" shut down. It's still filled with morally apprehensible content that should NOT be available to minors, and I intend to continue fighting the program. |
|
|
| Was a student Suspended over Distorted View? |
[Apr. 2nd, 2007|09:33 am] |
There's a thread on my old Blog about my efforts to get Distorted View shut down. One post is particularly disturbing.
"i agree!
(Anonymous)
2007-04-02 01:55 pm UTC (link)
i agree that ur a fucking piece of shit!
u think a little entertainment like distorted view daily is destroying america mean while u discriminate against every one possible in your blog the only reason anyone has ever reasponded to your blog is to make fun of u, u really have no purpose of living. im 14 and i support dv constantly i ve beenb suspended from school for putting up distorted view daily flyers all over my school every time a teacher took one down i put a new one up, i hope u fucking burn in hell."
Let's look at this more closely.
First, it's an Anonymous post. The poster wished to remain unknown or just didn't have a Livejournal login. I won't read anything into that.
"i agree that ur a fucking piece of shit!"
We can already see the kid can't write or spell properly. Is he lazy or just plain stupid? Then of course we get the stunning debate tactics of name calling and profanity. We're dealing with a real brain here folks.
"u think a little entertainment like distorted view daily is
destroying america"
Distorted View is not destroying America on it's own, but is part of a larger social problem with permissive attitudes and the erosion of our nation's moral base.
"mean while u discriminate against every one possible
in your blog the only reason anyone has ever reasponded(sic) to your blog is
to make fun of u, u really have no purpose of living."
That's a run-on sentence child. Learn to express yourself better. It's clear the kid hasn't read my blog very much because I do have a lot of supporting comments in other threads. As for the discrimination. yes, I discriminate against pornographers and pedophiles. I'm sorry this child look sup to such people as role models.
"im 14 and i
support dv constantly"
So, you're one of the "Underage Listeners" Distorted view's web site warns away, but the corrupting host of the show welcomes with open arms, making crass comments about molesting you. What has this program done to your young, impressionable mind?
"i ve beenb suspended from school for putting up
distorted view daily flyers all over my school"
Ah, there it is. The kid desperately needs his education, and promoting Distorted View has taken precedence over his schooling.
"every time a teacher
took one down i put a new one up,"
"An he fails to learn form his mistakes. He's mislead, uneducated and apparently fairly stupid.
"i hope u fucking burn in hell."
Hope all you want. I'm the one whose saved and washed clean in the blood of the lamb.
Does anyone still doubt that Distorted View is corrupting our youth?
|
|
|
| Emo Pro-Life band "Your Cardboard Heart" |
[Apr. 2nd, 2007|08:53 am] |
Fans of Emo music will appreciate "Your Cardboard Heart" with features
music about Faith, the challenges of life and the horror of Abortion.
Your Cardboard Heart's song, "Abortion" was be featured as
GarageBand.com's Emo Track of the Day on Thursday, the 7th of July,
2005. They even have a Podcast.
|
|
|
| Podcasts are out of control |
[Mar. 23rd, 2007|12:36 pm] |
A friend of mine recently told me about audio of Lesbian Actress Lilly Tomlin having a massive temper tantrum while filming her last (bombed at the box office) movie. He directed me to the Podcast that contained the audio. Specifically, the March 3, 2007 episode of a program called "Distorted View."
He only sent me the link to the MP3 file. If I'd seen the web site I never would have clicked "Play."
I listened to the first few minutes and got a good laugh out of the Heathen Lesbian Witch swearing up a storm becuase the director told her to "Tone down" her "Over the top" performance. Her anti-male feelings really came to the surface in her rants.
After she was done, I listened to some more of the show. I soon realized that the title wasn't a comment on the absurd behavior of those covered, but a reference to the perversions advocated by the show's host, a sicko who calls himself "Tim Henson."
I listened to another episode, and suddenly realized where I'd heard this pervert before. This is the same man who put out a video promoting Pedophilia.
This podcast and the garbage it contains must be stopped. He ends his programs by listening to voice mails from his fans. In his comments on those messages, he encourages his underage listeners to engage in deviant acts and jokes about sexually abusing them. His skits are racist. He encourages spouse abuse, often uttering the line 'The B***h probably deserved it" when reading stories of women being beaten or even killed. He mocks the deaths of children, laughing hysterically the more gruesome the child's death or maiming is. The show is rife with sick and perverted content of all kinds, including pornography of a nature I can not and will not discuss here. His fans still call in to rave about a pornographic story a female fan read in which she related the (fictional??) account of eating an aborted fetus as part of a sex act.
This hate filled Pedophile and his mocking pseudonym of "Tim Henson" is an example of everything that's wrong with the media, and a shining example of everything that we need to get OFF the Internet.
Since there is no real government regulation of the Internet, I've put together a petition that I will send to his web hosting agency. The goal is to deny him a hosting company, to get him removed from the Internet. If no one will host his content then he has no way to spread his diseased perversions.
Please, sign the petition and help get "Tim Henson" pulled form the air.
EDIT:
To all the people posting in defense of "Distorted View" I say this: In a recent episode, he read a graphic story in which a 12 year old girl was raped.
Tell me again how that isn't kiddie porn?
Oh, right, because it's supposed to be funny.
EDIT 2:
Tho those arguing that the story is "OK" because it's fiction.
You are ignorant of US federal law. Kiddie Porn, even simulated kiddie porn, has been held illegal.
Pedophiles were trying to get around Kiddie Porn laws by using CGI kids. The argument they used when caught was that since no actual children were used, it wasn't a crime.
The courts held that those who had copies of the CGI kiddie porn were subject to the same penalties as those who owned kiddie porn that used real children.
Under US Law, possessing, distributing or producing the fictional tale of a fictional child being raped by a fictional creature carries the same legal penalties as if Henson had played a recording of a REAL 12 year old being raped by a REAL person.
Whatever rationalizations you try to use, the bottom line is, the story is illegal. |
|
|
| It's legal for Muslims to beat their wives in Germany |
[Mar. 23rd, 2007|11:55 am] |
Don't you just LOVE the relativistic morals of today's liberals? Not only do they want to bend over backwards for the terrorists out to kill us all, but they want to bend and twist the laws to make their barbaric treatment of women legal.
What's next, legalization of foot binding so as to avoid offending Chinese sensibilities?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130605,00.html
A DIVORCE court judge ruled a man was RIGHT to beat and abuse his wife — because the Muslim holy book allowed it. The terrified partner, a 26-year-old mum of two, filed for a quickie divorce after her husband hit her and even threatened to kill her. But the judge in Frankfurt, Germany, rejected her application — quoting a Koran verse which some have controversially interpreted to mean a man can beat his wife if she acts in an “unchaste” fashion. The woman judge said it was “a religious thing” because both the wife and husband were from Morocco — home to many Muslims. She added: “The exercise of the right to castigate does not fulfil the hardship criteria defined by German law.” But the wife’s lawyer, Barbara Becker-Rojczyk filed a claim saying the judge had a conflict of interest and should have stepped down. She said: “The judge seems to be saying that the right to castigate means a husband can beat his wife. “Apparently the judge deems it unchaste when my client adapts a Western lifestyle.” The judge has since been excused from the case. |
|
|
| It's legal for the states to ban Islam |
[Jan. 19th, 2007|05:06 pm] |
Yes, yes, the Constitution declares "Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion."
What people forget, is that this dictum was never meant to drive a wedge between the state and religion. Quite the opposite.
Many of the founding 13 colonies had state religions. The wording of the Bill of Rights is clear, particularly where it declares "'All the power that is not expressly delegated to the federal government is reserved for the states."
Pat Robertson said it best:
"The first point in the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment to the Constitution, said 'Congress shall pass no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.' There were certain states at that time that had established religions. Massachusetts was a case in point. They had a state religion. And they didn't want this enormously powerful Congress to superimpose a religious system on their state system. To guarantee the states retained critical rights, the tenth amendment said, 'All the power that is not expressly delegated to the federal government is reserved for the states.' The intent? The people -- i.e. the states -- have delegated power. They gave up some powers, but they did not give up all powers because they are sovereign states."
What does this mean for the War on Terror?
To start with, it means that it's legal for the states to pass laws to prohibit a given religion. In this case, Islam.
Once Islam is illegal, you can start rounding up the terrorists and prospective terrorists on far easier grounds than proving they had an active plot to bomb the Sears Tower. Questioning them becomes easier, detaining them becomes easier and it's damn hard to orchestrate a terror attack from prison.
The benefits are immeasurable. All it would take is for a few states to make Islam illegal.
Let's say New York State is the first to ban Islam. Suddenly, anyone flying through a NYC airport or driving down an state road is subject to detention and arrest for praying to the Muslim Moon God Allah.
How many of the 9/11 hijackers would have been thwarted by this?
If Massachusetts had outlawed Islam before 9/11/2001 the hijackers would have been unable to hijack the planes they subsequently few into the World Trade Center and The Pentagon.
It's time we took a real stand against the perpetrators of violence, and outlawed a theology based on the murder of those who don't follow it.
They call it "the religion of peace" but their own religious book dictates unbelievers be killed. They seem to enjoy following that rule. If they're so eager to slaughter us, then I say we start by kicking them out of our country. |
|
|
| Kerry running in 2008? |
[Jan. 19th, 2007|03:16 pm] |
Personally, I think it will be a riot if Kerry runs again.
He's already proven that he can't win. I don't think he even carried his home state for crying out loud!
Let's see who the dems have lined up:
Obama Hussein: A man who is unelectable on so many fronts it's absurd. Most Americans, if they even know of him, think he's Muslim. Add to that the fact that he's black, and you've just handed the South and much of the Midwest to whomever the Republicans run.
Hillary Clinton: Aside form the fact that she's the most hated harpie in the nation, she's ALREADY been president for eight years. (What, you thought Bubba was running things???)
Kerry: Already had his ass handed to him in a fair election, and by the time 2008 rolls around the Democrats will have their own messes and scandals to clean up, like their complete and utter uselessness in 2007 and 2008. |
|
|
| Mondale rips Cheney for giving bad advice to Bush |
[Jan. 19th, 2007|02:37 pm] |
From the "You've got to be kidding me" file.
Mondale was the VP during the Carter administration, and is arguably the only man who outdid Carter in terms of being a neutered weakling in DC.
"If I had done as vice president what this vice president has done, Carter would have thrown me out of there," Mondale said.
That's because you, Mondale, are a weak-kneed spineless coward. You need to have a spine, courage and guts to act like Cheney, none of which are part of your limp-wristed personality.
 VS |
|
|
| China prepares to cripple West |
[Jan. 19th, 2007|11:08 am] |
the Chinese used a ground-based medium-range ballistic missile to destroy a weather satellite that had been launched in 1999.
Thank you Bill Clinton, for selling China the missile and weapons technology they needed to launch missiles capable of taking out our own satellites.
Thank you for giving them the tools to cripple and destroy the West.
Oh, and isn't it grand that they sold that same technology to North Korea, so that nation is now developing and testing missiles capable of taking out Japan?
I'm trying to think of a good historical president for your actions. My mind is searching for a similar act carried out by past Americans with similar consequences.
Oh, right. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg did something similar.
I wonder how Clinton can sleep at night, knowing that when Red China invades the US to murder our men and enslave our women, when the World's Oldest Functioning Republic is enslaved by Communism, it will be because of his actions.
Oh, wait, he IS a Communist. He thinks seeing America ground under a Communist Heel is a good thing.
And now his wife wants to be President. |
|
|
| Frankenbabies on the march |
[Jan. 19th, 2007|11:03 am] |
It's not bad enough the kid is going to grow up without a father, but his mother never even MET his Father.
No, this isn't another case of a sperm donor and turkey baster babies. In this latest abboration the sperm "donor" was already dead. A hospital defiled his corpse to "harvest" his sperm (specifically, remove his testicles) so his parents could have a stranger inseminated.
Ah, the joys of modern technology, where not even death can let a man rest in peace. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
cornswalled's journal
